Caution

First Right of Refusal / Right to Match

The contract gives the brand priority over your future engagement decisions in the covered category.

Show it
Look in the exclusivity or future-engagement section for phrases like "right of first refusal", "right to match", "first look", "shall first offer", "shall first notify", "opportunity to match", or "before accepting any competing offer". Section headings like "First Refusal" or "Matching Right" are strong signals.
Decode it
First right of refusal introduces friction and timing uncertainty into every future engagement in the covered category. Unlike outright exclusivity, you can work with competitors - but each opportunity must be routed through the brand first. Competing brands often decline when an offer is subject to matching because your effective availability is uncertain. Matching rights can also depress competing bids because the offer functions partly as a benchmark for the original brand rather than a confirmed engagement.
Fix it
Push on four axes: shorten the matching window (5-7 business days is the commercially routine range), narrow the coverage to a named-competitor list (3-5 brands typically), time-box the right to the engagement period (avoid extending into a tail), and limit disclosure to existence and headline terms rather than full competing-offer detail.

What it means

This contract gives the brand priority over your future engagement decisions. Two common forms: a "first look" right requires you to offer the brand the opportunity first before accepting any competing offer; a "right to match" requires you to disclose competing offers and give the brand the chance to match before accepting them. Unlike category or tail exclusivity, you are not banned from working with competitors; but each competing engagement must be routed through the brand first.

First right of refusal introduces friction and timing uncertainty into every future engagement in the covered category. Competing brands may decline to engage when the offer is subject to a matching right because your effective availability is uncertain. Matching rights can also depress the price competing brands offer, because the offer functions partly as a benchmark for the original brand rather than a confirmed engagement. Where the matching window is long, the category is broad, and the right survives the engagement, the practical opportunity loss can be substantial.

What to check before you sign

  • ·Is the right a "first look" (offer to brand first) or "right to match" (match a competing offer)?
  • ·How long is the matching window; how many days does the brand have to decide?
  • ·How broad is the covered category, named competitors only, category-wide, or industry-wide?
  • ·Does the right apply only during the term, or extend into a tail period?
  • ·What information must you disclose about competing offers, existence only, headline terms, or full detail?
  • ·Are there carve-outs for pre-existing partnerships or specific named non-competitors?

How to fix it

  • moderate

    Negotiate the matching window down to 5-7 business days, which gives the brand reasonable time to decide without materially delaying the creator's competing engagements.

  • moderate

    Replace category-wide coverage with a named competitor list (typically 3-5 brands), leaving other engagements outside the matching process.

  • easy

    Limit the right to the engagement period only, with no surviving matching right after termination.

  • moderate

    Define the disclosure obligation as existence and headline financial terms only, not full competing-offer detail, scope, or counterparty information.

  • easy

    Carve out pre-existing partnerships, ongoing relationships, or specifically named engagements from the matching process.

Negotiating it

A good opening

"I'd like to firm up the matching right. Could we shorten the window to 5-7 business days, narrow the coverage to a named competitor list, and limit it to the engagement period without a tail? "

When to walk away

Broad first right of refusal over a wide category, long matching window (30+ days), full disclosure obligation, and surviving the engagement into a tail period, combined with a no-premium-for- exclusivity clause, is a strong walk-away signal. The combination creates ongoing friction on the creator's entire commercial pipeline without compensation.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, consult a qualified solicitor.