High risk

Missing Usage Period

The licence has no defined end date; the brand can keep using your content indefinitely.

Show it
Read your licence-grant clause carefully and check whether it states any duration - a number of months or years, a calendar end date, or any reference to a period. The licence section typically sits near "Grant of Rights" or "Licence". Sometimes there is also a separate "Term" section that defines the licence period indirectly. If neither section names a duration, you have a missing usage period.
Decode it
A licence with no defined end date is commercially equivalent to a perpetual grant - except worse. With explicit perpetual language you at least have agreed scope to refer back to. With a missing period, the brand can keep using your content indefinitely and there is no agreed language saying so or saying otherwise. The most permissive interpretation usually wins in practice, which means the brand keeps the content active and you have no contract leverage to ask them to stop.
Fix it
Ask for the missing duration to be added. The standard fix is a 12-month period from first publication with the option to renew at an agreed fee. This is treated as a boilerplate correction in most brand contracts - legal teams typically did not consciously choose "no period", they just left it out. The fix is generally easy once you ask for it.

What it means

This contract gives the brand the right to use your content, but does not say for how long. There is no end date, no expiry, and no point at which the brand's right to use the content stops. In commercial practice this works the same way as a perpetual grant; the brand can keep using your content indefinitely.

Without a usage period, there is no agreed point at which the brand's right to use your content ends.

What to check before you sign

  • ·Does the licence clause specify a number of months, years, or a calendar end date anywhere?
  • ·Is there a section for "Term", "Duration", "Licence Period", or "Expiry" that you may have missed?
  • ·Does the contract reference an exhibit or schedule that might define the period elsewhere?
  • ·Are there any termination provisions that effectively bound the licence?
  • ·What is the brand's actual intended use, is this likely an oversight or deliberate?

How to fix it

  • Insert an explicit usage period, typically 12 months from first publication, into the licence grant clause.

  • Along with the defined period, add an explicit renewal fee or renewal pricing formula so extension is straightforward.

  • Where the brand resists a defined period, add a clause allowing either party to terminate the licence on notice, effectively bounding the unbounded right.

  • Where the licence is genuinely campaign-bound, link the licence period explicitly to the campaign, "for the duration of the Campaign as defined in Schedule A".

Negotiating it

A good opening

"The licence clause doesn't set a usage period. Could we add a 12-month window from first publication, with the option to renew? "

When to walk away

If the brand explicitly states they want the licence to remain open-ended and refuses to add any defined period, renewal mechanism, or termination right, the creator is effectively being asked to grant perpetual rights without acknowledging it. This is a walk-away signal unless the fee materially reflects perpetual scope.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, get independent legal advice from a qualified professional.