High risk

Unbounded / Absolute Warranty Scope

The IP warranties are stated absolutely, no knowledge qualifier or diligence standard.

Show it
Look in the warranties section for phrases like "absolute warranty", "unconditionally warrants", "irrevocably warrants", "without qualification", or "warranties are absolute". The ABSENCE of a knowledge qualifier like "to the best of the creator's knowledge" is the most important signal - well-drafted IP warranties always include some form of knowledge or diligence qualifier.
Decode it
Absolute warranties expose you to liability for IP failures you could not reasonably have identified - similar work you have not encountered, third-party rights not visible in standard searches, sub-licence defects upstream of you. Where well-drafted warranties bound liability to events you could discover with reasonable diligence, absolute warranties remove that protection. The clause is materially worse when combined with broad indemnity scope and uncapped liability.
Fix it
The single most important move is to add a knowledge qualifier ("to the best of the creator's knowledge following reasonable inquiry"). Where absolute language must be preserved, push for: a liability cap on warranty breach, carve-outs for specific event categories outside the creator's reasonable verification, and insurance alignment.

What it means

This contract states IP warranties in absolute terms, no qualifier about your knowledge, no diligence standard, no carve-outs for events outside your reasonable ability to verify. Well-drafted warranties typically use "to the best of the creator's knowledge" or "following reasonable inquiry"; absolute warranties remove these protections entirely.

Absolute warranties can make you liable for rights problems you could not reasonably have found. The clause is materially worse when combined with broad indemnity scope (more events trigger warranty claims) and uncapped liability (no ceiling on damages).

What to check before you sign

  • ·Is the warranty qualified by "to the best of the creator's knowledge" or stated absolutely?
  • ·Is there a diligence standard ("following reasonable inquiry") or does the warranty apply regardless of inquiry?
  • ·Are there carve-outs for events outside the creator's reasonable verification capacity?
  • ·Is the absolute warranty paired with a liability cap?
  • ·Does the absolute warranty extend to brand-provided third-party content?
  • ·Does your professional insurance cover absolute warranty breach?

How to fix it

  • Add "to the best of the creator's knowledge following reasonable inquiry" qualifier to all IP warranties. Single most important fix.

  • Add a defined diligence standard (e.g., "following industry-standard clearance procedures") qualifying what counts as reasonable inquiry.

  • Cap warranty breach liability, for example at a level linked to the engagement fee, even where warranty scope remains absolute.

  • Carve out events outside the creator's reasonable verification capacity (upstream sub-licence defects, similar independent works, third-party documentation provided to creator).

Negotiating it

A good opening

"Could we qualify the warranties with "to the best of the creator's knowledge following reasonable inquiry"? "

When to walk away

Absolute warranties combined with uncapped liability, broad indemnity scope, no diligence carve-outs, and refusal to add any knowledge qualifier is a strong walk-away signal. The structure creates open-ended creator liability for matters the creator cannot reasonably verify or control.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, get independent legal advice from a qualified professional.