Caution

No Force Majeure For Creator

Brand can invoke force majeure; creator cannot; asymmetric excuse structure leaves breach exposure on extraordinary events.

Show it

Look in the force-majeure or creator- obligations section for phrases like "Creator's obligations are not excused", "Creator shall remain bound regardless", "force majeure does not apply to Creator", or silence on creator-side excuse rights paired with a detailed brand-side force-majeure provision.

Decode it

Force- majeure reciprocity is the fairness floor. Both parties face the same risk of extraordinary events; both should be able to invoke suspension on equivalent triggers. Asymmetric force- majeure leaves the creator liable for performance on schedule even where illness, family emergency, natural disaster, or other extraordinary events materially affect delivery capacity.

Fix it

Push for: mutual force- majeure with equivalent invocation triggers; or at minimum, narrow creator- side excuse rights for documented illness, family emergency, or named natural disasters; explicit preservation of common- law frustration as a backstop; liability cap on damages for extraordinary- event non- performance where mutual force-majeure cannot be secured.

What it means

This contract lets the brand invoke force majeure to excuse or suspend its obligations when extraordinary events occur, but does not give you a matching right. If illness, family emergency, natural disaster, or other extraordinary events affect your ability to deliver, you remain contractually bound to perform on schedule.

Force-majeure reciprocity is where the fairness floor sits. Both sides face the same risk of extraordinary events; both should have the same excuse rights. Where the brand can invoke but the creator cannot, the creator carries breach exposure (liquidated damages, clawback, replacement- creator costs) on triggers that would ordinarily excuse performance. Common-law frustration may provide a backstop but its threshold is higher.

What to check before you sign

·Does the contract recognise creator force majeure at all?
·If so, is the creator-side definition narrower than brand-side?
·Are illness, family emergency, or named natural events explicitly covered?
·Is the clause expressly mutual?
·Is common-law frustration preserved or displaced?

How to fix it

moderate
Convert force- majeure provision to mutual, either party may invoke on equivalent triggers with the same notice and mitigation obligations.
moderate
Add narrow creator- side excuse rights for defined events (illness, family emergency, natural disaster) with documentation requirements.
easy
Add explicit language preserving common- law frustration doctrine as a backstop for creator- side events.
harder
Where mutual force- majeure is unavailable, add a liability cap limiting damages for non- performance triggered by documented extraordinary events.

Negotiating it

A good opening

"Could we make the force- majeure provision mutual; so either party can invoke suspension on equivalent triggers? At minimum, please add narrow creator- side excuse rights for documented illness, family emergency, or named natural disasters. "

When to walk away

Asymmetric force-majeure (broad brand-side, none creator- side) combined with liquidated damages, clawback rights, no liability cap, broad indemnity, and no creator termination rights, creates a structure where the creator carries substantive breach exposure even where extraordinary events materially affect delivery capacity. Strong walk-away signal, particularly where the engagement timeline is long enough that extraordinary events are materially probable.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, consult a qualified solicitor.