Creator Indemnity Obligation
The contract requires you to defend the brand and pay for losses arising from claims connected to your work.
What it means
This contract requires you to defend the brand and pay for losses if a third party makes a claim connected to your work, conduct, or content. The financial exposure can be large, damages, settlement payments, legal costs, judgments. Where the indemnity is broad and uncapped, your exposure is not bounded by the engagement fee and can materially exceed it.
Indemnity is the single largest financial exposure most creators carry in branded engagements. Broad one-way indemnity converts the brand's third-party-claim risk into your problem. Where the scope covers "any claim arising out of or in connection with" the engagement, you may absorb consequences for events outside your control, including brand decisions about how the content is used, claims about brand- provided assets, and disputes triggered by brand-side conduct. The clause is materially worse when paired with no liability cap, no mutual indemnity, and a defence obligation requiring you to fund legal defence regardless of merit.
What to check before you sign
- ·Is the indemnity scope narrow (defined creator-controllable risks) or broad ("any claim")?
- ·Is there a liability cap, and at what level (engagement fee, multiple of fee, specific dollar amount)?
- ·Is the indemnity mutual; does the brand owe a corresponding obligation for brand-side events?
- ·Are there carve-outs for brand-caused, brand-directed, or brand-provided events?
- ·Does the indemnity include a defence obligation? If so, who selects counsel and controls strategy?
- ·Are defence costs excluded from any cap, effectively making the cap meaningless?
- ·Is there an insurance requirement, and does available insurance match the indemnity scope?
How to fix it
- moderate
Cap the creator's aggregate indemnity liability at the engagement fee (or 1-3x fee). The simplest single fix and widely accepted.
- moderate
Limit indemnity scope to specific creator-controllable warranties, originality of work, no third-party infringement, no defamation, breach of defined contract warranties.
- moderate
Add a brand-to-creator indemnity covering brand-side events, brand-provided materials, brand-directed edits, brand misuse of work, brand marketing decisions.
- moderate
Carve out claims arising from brand-provided assets, brand- directed changes, brand marketing decisions, or brand misuse from the creator's indemnity scope.
- harder
Where a defence obligation is preserved, require shared control over counsel selection and settlement decisions, and exclude defence costs from any liability cap.
- moderate
Confirm the indemnity scope aligns with available professional indemnity insurance; where it does not, either narrow the scope or the brand assumes the difference.
Negotiating it
"The indemnity scope needs review. Could we cap aggregate liability at 2x the engagement fee, narrow the indemnity to my warranties (originality, no infringement, defined contract warranties), add a mutual indemnity for brand-provided materials and brand-directed decisions, and carve out claims from brand misuse? "
Broad uncapped one-way indemnity with a defence obligation, no brand-caused carve-out, no insurance alignment, and combined with clawback rights or fee forfeiture is a strong walk-away signal where engagement value is meaningful. The structure creates open- ended financial liability that can materially exceed the engagement fee with no procedural relief.
Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.
Scan your contract free →Related clauses
Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, consult a qualified solicitor.