Caution

Quality Standards Undefined

The contract requires quality without defining what quality means operationally.

Show it
Look in the deliverables, specifications, or quality section for phrases like "professional quality", "industry standard", "broadcast quality", "highest quality", or "to a professional standard". The absence of attached technical specifications, named industry standards, or sample deliverables is the strongest signal.
Decode it
Undefined quality standards create ambiguous breach exposure. You can be alleged to have failed the standard without a defined baseline to argue against. Where the brand stacks multiple undefined standards ("professional, broadcast, industry"), the ambiguity compounds. The clause is most exposing when paired with subjective approval, undefined payment milestones, and high-stakes engagement value.
Fix it
Push for objective specifications - attached technical parameters (resolution, codec, duration, format), a reference to a named industry standard you can verify against, or quality defined by reference to a sample deliverable you have produced and the brand has approved. Sample- deliverable baselines are typically the easiest single fix.

What it means

This contract requires your deliverable to meet a quality standard ("professional quality", "industry standard", "broadcast quality") without defining what that standard means in operational terms, no attached specifications, no named technical benchmarks, no sample deliverable. The bar exists but its height is unclear.

Undefined quality standards create ambiguous breach exposure. You can be alleged to have failed the standard without a defined baseline to argue against. Where the brand stacks multiple undefined standards ("professional quality, broadcast standard, and industry practice"), the ambiguity compounds. The clause is most exposing when paired with subjective approval (so the brand judges compliance), undefined payment milestones (so payment depends on that judgement), and high-stakes engagement value.

What to check before you sign

  • ·Is the quality standard supplemented with attached technical specifications?
  • ·Are named industry standards referenced (and are those standards accessible)?
  • ·Is the standard defined by reference to your prior work or a sample deliverable?
  • ·Are quality terms stacked ("professional, broadcast, industry") or single?
  • ·Is compliance with the standard linked to payment, acceptance, or termination?
  • ·What are the consequences of alleged non-compliance, revision, termination, fee forfeiture, damages?

How to fix it

  • moderate

    Attach technical specifications defining objective quality parameters (resolution, codec, bitrate, duration, format) alongside the subjective quality language.

  • moderate

    Define quality by reference to a named industry standard (e.g., platform delivery specifications, broadcast technical standards) that is externally verifiable.

  • easy

    Define the quality bar by reference to a sample deliverable the creator has previously produced and the brand has approved.

  • moderate

    Where multiple subjective standards are stacked, narrow to a single defined standard rather than open-ended cumulative ones.

Negotiating it

A good opening

"Could we attach a technical specifications schedule defining the quality parameters operationally, resolution, format, delivery requirements, alongside the quality language? "

When to walk away

Stacked undefined quality standards ("professional, broadcast, industry, workmanlike") combined with subjective approval, payment gated on acceptance, and no technical specifications is a strong walk-away signal where the engagement is high value. The structure creates indefinite ambiguous liability with no objective compliance baseline.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, consult a qualified solicitor.