What is a one-way attorney fees clause?

It is a clause saying the creator pays the brand's legal costs if the brand wins a dispute, with no matching obligation on the brand if the creator wins. The one-sided version is the pattern worth questioning; a mutual version applies the same rule to both parties.

Is a one-way legal costs clause negotiable?

Commonly, yes. The usual asks are a reciprocal prevailing-party clause that works both ways, each party bearing its own costs, or a cap on how much can be recovered.

Why does a one-way legal costs clause matter for creators?

Legal costs in a contested dispute can exceed the value of the claim itself, so a one-way clause makes pursuing even a legitimate complaint expensive to risk. That pressure is the clause's practical effect, and it is why the mutual version is the fairer standard.

Caution

One-Way Attorney Fees

A one-way attorney fees clause, often headed legal costs or costs of enforcement, means you pay the brand's legal costs if the brand wins a dispute, while the brand pays nothing towards yours if you win. The imbalance is commonly negotiable: a reciprocal clause, or each side bearing its own costs.

Show it

Look in the dispute resolution, enforcement, or breach section for phrases like "creator shall reimburse the brand for attorneys' fees", "brand shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees", "indemnify against legal costs", or "costs of enforcement including attorneys' fees".

Decode it

One-way fee shifting means you pay the brand's legal costs if the brand wins, but the brand has no matching obligation if you win. In contested commercial disputes, attorney fees often exceed the underlying claim value - so the asymmetry converts dispute cost into a deterrent against pursuing legitimate claims.

Fix it

Push for: a reciprocal prevailing-party clause that applies symmetrically; each-party-bears-its-own fees; a cap on fee recovery at the contract value; or a narrowed trigger limited to material breach or bad-faith claims.

What it means

This contract requires you to pay the brand's attorney fees and legal costs if the brand prevails in a dispute against you, but the brand has no matching obligation to pay your fees if you win. Fee asymmetry converts dispute cost into a deterrent against pursuing claims, even meritorious ones.

A one-way legal fees clause means only you could end up paying the other side's legal costs in a dispute. With one-way fee shifting, your downside risk is the claim amount plus the brand's legal costs; your upside is only the claim amount.

What to check before you sign

·Is the fee-shifting one-way or reciprocal?
·What triggers fee recovery, any breach or material breach?
·Are fees capped at a defined amount?
·Are filing fees, expert witness costs, and other expenses included?
·Is the clause tied to mandatory arbitration?
·Does prevailing-party language apply symmetrically?

How to fix it

Change one-way fee shifting to a reciprocal prevailing-party clause applying symmetrically to either party.
Replace fee shifting with each-party-bears-its-own fees, removing the asymmetric deterrent.
Cap fee recovery at a defined amount or at the underlying contract fee, bounding the creator's cost exposure.
Narrow the trigger from "any breach" to "material breach" or "bad-faith claims", limiting when fee shifting applies.

Negotiating it

A good opening

"Could we make the legal fees clause a reciprocal prevailing-party clause that applies equally to both of us, or have each party bear its own legal fees? "

When to walk away

One-way attorney fees plus mandatory arbitration plus distant venue plus class-action waiver plus broad indemnity creates a dispute-resolution structure where the creator bears full procedural cost, substantive exposure, and the brand's legal costs on any contested dispute. Strong walk-away signal.

FAQs

What is a one-way attorney fees clause?: It is a clause saying the creator pays the brand's legal costs if the brand wins a dispute, with no matching obligation on the brand if the creator wins. The one-sided version is the pattern worth questioning; a mutual version applies the same rule to both parties.
Is a one-way legal costs clause negotiable?: Commonly, yes. The usual asks are a reciprocal prevailing-party clause that works both ways, each party bearing its own costs, or a cap on how much can be recovered.
Why does a one-way legal costs clause matter for creators?: Legal costs in a contested dispute can exceed the value of the claim itself, so a one-way clause makes pursuing even a legitimate complaint expensive to risk. That pressure is the clause's practical effect, and it is why the mutual version is the fairer standard.

Find this clause in your own contract.

Scan your brand deal free - 2 contract scans, no card required.

Scan your contract free →

Related clauses

Educational guidance, not legal advice. For high-value or complex deals, get independent legal advice from a qualified professional.